![Scholars Week](../../../../assets/md5images/11492f5248c910af725831041803e172.png)
COHFA | Psychology: Projects in Progress
Social Media and Current Events
Academic Level at Time of Presentation
Senior
Major
Psychology/Sociology
Minor
N/A
List all Project Mentors & Advisor(s)
Patrick Cushen, Ph.D.
Presentation Format
Poster Presentation
Abstract/Description
Over the last decade the Internet has seen rapid growth in our society. By 2011, 75.6% of families reported owning a computer in their household (File, 2013). That growth has led to the dawn of the age of smartphones and social media applications and today 64% of American adults own a cell phone (Smith, 2015). It can be difficult to determine credibility when using social media for information. One reason for this might be that the line for what is credible or not becomes slightly blurred in the social media world, partially because certain pages or accounts on social media are different than others in that some are labeled with words like “official” or “verified”. The purpose of this study is to look at the effect of “verified”, “non-verified” Twitter accounts, and news updates to determine if the status of the social media source matters. We gathered participants’ demographics and tested false memory formation using images of a robbery followed by a distraction running span task. Next, participants were given a confidence test. Finally, we gauged their Twitter usage with a Likert Scale questionnaire. Upon completion of this study, we hypothesize participants will be more likely to encode false information coming “verified” Twitter accounts than any other presented medium.
keywords: social media, false memory formation,encoding, credible sources
Location
Classroom 210, Waterfield Library
Start Date
November 2016
End Date
November 2016
Affiliations
Psychology: Projects in Progress
Social Media and Current Events
Classroom 210, Waterfield Library
Over the last decade the Internet has seen rapid growth in our society. By 2011, 75.6% of families reported owning a computer in their household (File, 2013). That growth has led to the dawn of the age of smartphones and social media applications and today 64% of American adults own a cell phone (Smith, 2015). It can be difficult to determine credibility when using social media for information. One reason for this might be that the line for what is credible or not becomes slightly blurred in the social media world, partially because certain pages or accounts on social media are different than others in that some are labeled with words like “official” or “verified”. The purpose of this study is to look at the effect of “verified”, “non-verified” Twitter accounts, and news updates to determine if the status of the social media source matters. We gathered participants’ demographics and tested false memory formation using images of a robbery followed by a distraction running span task. Next, participants were given a confidence test. Finally, we gauged their Twitter usage with a Likert Scale questionnaire. Upon completion of this study, we hypothesize participants will be more likely to encode false information coming “verified” Twitter accounts than any other presented medium.
keywords: social media, false memory formation,encoding, credible sources